save sessions

This commit is contained in:
2026-03-17 16:38:32 +00:00
parent cc12bb9190
commit 1d5db23dcd
130 changed files with 106291 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
{
"sessionId": "b4d0330e-9f58-4a70-b3d6-560b1bb3162d",
"projectHash": "c4ece9c032ac20d038bbd73e9aa5f86cb3fd24c826b8e99b6edcd77db288fcb1",
"startTime": "2026-03-03T15:17:46.816Z",
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-03T15:17:51.297Z",
"messages": [
{
"id": "b95dc682-6b2c-4495-96de-5470e86f9732",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T15:17:46.816Z",
"type": "user",
"content": [
{
"text": "deactivate a venv"
}
]
},
{
"id": "034cebe6-a5aa-47ab-945b-c3e35f1104d6",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T15:17:51.297Z",
"type": "gemini",
"content": "To deactivate a virtual environment in your current shell, simply run:\n\n```bash\ndeactivate\n```",
"thoughts": [
{
"subject": "Analyzing Deactivation Strategy",
"description": "I'm currently considering the user's implicit context; they're probably inside an active virtual environment. The standard approach, \"deactivate,\" seems the logical first step, assuming a typical shell session. My internal processes are formulating a response tailored for this scenario, avoiding unnecessary complications.",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T15:17:49.735Z"
},
{
"subject": "Determining Optimal Response",
"description": "The context is now clear: the user requires the `deactivate` command. My previous analysis of their prompt pointed towards either instruction or inquiry. Considering my role, a concise and direct answer, providing the command, seems best. I'm finalizing the response now, aiming for clarity and brevity in execution.",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T15:17:51.202Z"
}
],
"tokens": {
"input": 15532,
"output": 21,
"cached": 3218,
"thoughts": 254,
"tool": 0,
"total": 15807
},
"model": "gemini-3-flash-preview"
}
],
"kind": "main"
}